The Global Anti-Globalist NAZI Network: A New World Order

The rise of global anti-globalist organizations has reshaped political landscapes worldwide, often fueled by xenophobia, ultra-nationalism, and authoritarian ideologies. As ironically mentioned, while these organizations are anti-globalist movements, they’re globally interconnected. These movements, which range from far-right paramilitary groups to politically influential parties, share common enemies: globalization, multiculturalism, and liberal democracy. While these organizations publicly champion nationalist sentiments, behind the scenes, a complex web of illicit financial flows and influential patrons sustains their operations. Let’s discover the financial mechanisms keeping these groups alive, exposing their links to billionaires, state actors, and corporate interests. Most of these organizations are publicly visible online; however, the police don’t do their job to stop them.

Please do not join any of these organizations!
Engaging with them is both unethical and illegal, as they train and promote dangerous radical extremists.

Divide et Impera: The Global Strategy Behind Nationalist Movements

The resurgence of anti-globalist nationalist organizations is not merely a spontaneous grassroots phenomenon but often a manifestation of strategic manipulation rooted in the ancient principle of “Divide et Impera”—divide and conquer. Empires and statesmen have employed this age-old tactic to fracture potential opposition, ensuring control through division. In the contemporary context, the proliferation of nationalist ideologies serves the interests of various global actors seeking to destabilize unified entities and advance their geopolitical agendas.

Historically, “Divide et Impera” has been a cornerstone of imperial governance. The British Empire, for instance, adeptly applied this strategy in colonial India by exacerbating religious and ethnic divisions, thereby weakening collective resistance to colonial rule. By promoting discord among diverse communities, the British ensured that a united front against their dominance remained elusive. This manipulation of societal fissures is detailed in analyses of British colonial tactics, highlighting how engineered divisions facilitated prolonged control over subjugated populations.

In the current geopolitical landscape, similar strategies are observable. However, these divisions are no longer solely engineered by nation-states, but rather by the world’s most powerful financial and political actors. Global economic elites, including multinational corporations, oligarchs, and financial institutions, utilize “Divide et Impera” to fragment societies through a process of nationalist isolation. This nationalist isolation ensures that nations become internally divided, making it easier to manipulate political, economic, and social structures according to the interests of these global financial powers.

By exacerbating nationalist divisions, these financial powers create an environment where populist movements are driven by internal struggles rather than unified global opposition to economic exploitation. The nationalist factions they support serve as instruments to deflect attention from broader economic injustices, reinforcing the dominance of the very global elites they claim to oppose. As a result, the strategic use of nationalist ideologies and nationalist isolation has become an essential tool for the maintenance of financial and political control over divided populations.

What Was NAZI?

The Nazi ideology was a far-right nationalist party created by Adolf Hitler. It combined extreme nationalism, racism, anti-Semitism, and militarism to create a totalitarian state that sought global dominance. Nazi Germany pursued expansionist policies that led to World War II and orchestrated the Holocaust, resulting in the deaths of millions.

Despite its historical defeat, elements of this ideology have persisted, evolving into modern far-right extremism, white supremacy movements, and ultranationalist organizations.

NAZI Never Ended: The Underground Network

Despite the official defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945, the ideology and its followers did not disappear. Instead, they rebranded, adapted, and continued operating under different guises throughout the world. Many Nazi officials and sympathizers found refuge in South America, the United States, and parts of Europe, where they rebuilt networks of influence. These groups remained active, often integrating into nationalist movements, far-right political factions, and extremist paramilitary organizations.

The financial and ideological backing for these groups came from influential actors who sought to preserve Nazi ideologies under the radar. Over the decades, their operations extended to various political, economic, and military spheres, fueling far-right movements across the globe.

Following the collapse of Nazi Germany, many high-ranking officials evaded justice through networks such as Operation Paperclip (where Nazi scientists were recruited by the United States) and ODESSA (a secret escape network for SS officers). Many fled to countries like Argentina, Brazil, and Chile, where they integrated into local far-right movements.

Throughout the Cold War, Nazi-influenced groups found unexpected support from the Soviet Union, the United States, and other geopolitical actors. While the West absorbed Nazi scientists for technological advancements, the Soviet Union facilitated the growth of nationalist factions in key regions to destabilize the West.

Communist Support for Underground NAZI Networks

The most significant backing for post-war nationalist extremism came from communist Russia. Seeking to divide and weaken Western democracies, Soviet intelligence agencies covertly supported the rise of nationalist movements, particularly in the United States, Central America, and South America.

By funding and manipulating nationalist organizations, the Soviet Union aimed to create internal strife within democratic nations. The goal was simple: Divide and Destroy. By pitting extremist groups against each other, they could weaken Western unity and create favorable conditions for communist expansion.

Even today, Russian intelligence networks are known to infiltrate and manipulate nationalist movements worldwide, using them as tools for geopolitical influence and destabilization.

Political Figures and Their Influence

• Vladimir Putin – The President of Russia has positioned himself as a leader for Christian nationalist and right-wing movements, expanding the influence of the Russian Orthodox Church and aligning state policies with conservative Christian values.
• Viktor Orbán – Hungary’s Prime Minister has championed Christian nationalism, enforcing strict anti-immigration laws and promoting policies that emphasize Hungary’s Christian identity.
• Elon Musk – The billionaire has shown support for far-right political entities, including Germany’s Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, and has engaged with controversial political movements.

Mapping the Extremist Landscape

Nationalist organizations have taken root on nearly every continent, often adapting to local conditions while maintaining ideological similarities. The presence of groups such as the Proud Boys in the U.S., Golden Dawn in Greece, the Russian Imperial Movement, and the Hindutva extremist factions in India signifies a global trend. Their ability to operate, expand, and organize violent activities is heavily reliant on financial backers, many of whom wield political and economic influence.

Most of these organizations are publicly visible online. We won’t publicise their websites since we don’t support this movement.

Please do not join any of these organizations!
Engaging with them is both unethical and illegal, as they train and promote dangerous radical extremists.

Here is the list of global anti-globalist extremist organizations:

North America

• Proud Boys (USA, Canada) – A far-right, male-only extremist group promoting nationalism and often linked to political violence.
• Oath Keepers (USA) – A militia movement composed mainly of former military and law enforcement personnel, emphasizing anti-government conspiracy theories.
• Boogaloo Movement (USA) – A loosely affiliated extremist group advocating for a second civil war in the U.S., often involved in violent protests.
• Atomwaffen Division (USA, Canada, UK, Germany) – A neo-Nazi terrorist organization focused on violent revolution and white supremacy.
• The Base (USA, Canada, Australia, South Africa) – A white supremacist paramilitary network seeking to accelerate societal collapse through violence.
• Ku Klux Klan (USA) – One of the oldest white supremacist hate groups, historically known for racial violence and domestic terrorism.
• Aryan Brotherhood (USA) – A violent prison gang with white supremacist ideology, heavily involved in organized crime and domestic extremism.
• National Socialist Movement (USA) – A neo-Nazi political group espousing extreme white nationalism and racial segregation policies.
• Blood & Honour (USA, Canada, UK, Germany, Russia, Scandinavia) – A neo-Nazi extremist network that spreads propaganda through music and underground movements.
• Vanguard America (USA) – A white nationalist group advocating for an ethnically homogeneous society and known for involvement in violent demonstrations.

Europe

• Golden Dawn (Greece) – A now-banned Greek ultranationalist party with violent neo-Nazi elements, known for attacks on migrants and leftist activists.
• CasaPound Italia (Italy) – A far-right political movement inspired by fascist ideology, known for nationalist rhetoric and social activism.
• National Action (UK – banned) – A neo-Nazi terrorist group advocating racial violence, banned by the UK government.
• Nordic Resistance Movement (Scandinavia) – A violent neo-Nazi group active in Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, and Iceland, promoting white supremacy.
• Identitarian Movement (Germany, Austria, France, Italy) – A European nationalist movement opposing immigration and advocating for cultural preservation.
• Generation Identity (France, UK, Germany, Austria) – A youth-driven far-right movement promoting white European identity and opposing multiculturalism.
• For Britain Movement (UK) – A nationalist political party known for its anti-Islam and anti-immigration policies.
• Die Rechte (Germany) – A small neo-Nazi party linked to extremist networks and involved in far-right demonstrations.
• Der Dritte Weg / The Third Way (Germany) – A far-right party supporting nationalist policies and opposing immigration.
• Magyar Gárda / Hungarian Guard (Hungary) – A paramilitary group advocating for Hungarian nationalism and racial purity.
• Noua Dreaptă (Romania) – A Romanian ultranationalist and far-right organization opposing immigration and advocating for a nationalist state.
• Legiunea Arhanghelului Mihail (Romania) – Inspired by the historical Iron Guard, this movement promotes Romanian nationalism and Orthodox identity.
• Frăția Ortodoxă (Romania) – A nationalist movement advocating Orthodox supremacy and Romanian ethnonationalism.

Russia and Former Soviet States

• Russian Imperial Movement (Russia) – A white supremacist paramilitary group supporting ultranationalist causes and violent militancy.
• Wotan Jugend (Russia, Ukraine, Germany, Poland) – A neo-Nazi organization with extremist propaganda and recruitment operations across multiple countries.
• Rusich (Russia, Ukraine) – A Russian paramilitary unit involved in conflicts, known for its neo-Nazi affiliations.
• Serbian Action (Serbia) – A far-right ultranationalist group promoting Serbian supremacy and traditionalist values.
• National Corps (Ukraine) – A nationalist political party with paramilitary roots, advocating for an ethnically pure Ukrainian state.
• Right Sector (Ukraine) – A radical nationalist coalition with a history of militancy and involvement in conflicts.
• Svoboda (Ukraine) – A far-right political party known for nationalist rhetoric and advocacy against multiculturalism.
• BORN (Russia – disbanded but influenced new groups) – A violent neo-Nazi group responsible for political assassinations and attacks.
• Russian National Unity (Russia) – A militant ultranationalist movement known for promoting xenophobic ideologies.
• Imperial Legion (Russia) – A paramilitary organization advocating for Russian imperial expansion and ultranationalism.

Latin America

• Esquadrão da Morte / Death Squad (Brazil) – A violent paramilitary group engaged in extrajudicial killings, mainly targeting criminals and left-wing activists.
• Frente Nacionalista Patria y Libertad (Chile) – A far-right nationalist movement promoting authoritarian and anti-communist ideals.
• Movimento Integralista e Linearista Brasileiro (Brazil) – A fascist-inspired movement seeking a corporatist state based on nationalist and Catholic principles.
• Tercera Fuerza (Argentina) – A nationalist organization with a history of political violence and opposition to left-wing movements.
• National-Socialist Movement Chile (Chile) – A neo-Nazi group advocating for racial purity and white supremacist ideology.
• Nuevo Orden Argentina (Argentina) – A nationalist organization promoting extreme right-wing policies and historical revisionism.
• Mexican Nationalist Front (Mexico) – A far-right movement advocating for xenophobic and nationalist policies.
• Falange Española (Spain, Latin American presence) – A movement inspired by Spanish fascism, supporting nationalist authoritarian rule.
• Anticommunist Movement of Colombia (Colombia) – A paramilitary group with links to right-wing militias targeting leftist organizations.
• White Aryan Resistance Latin America (Multiple countries) – A transnational neo-Nazi organization promoting white supremacy across Latin America.

Asia and Middle East

• Hindutva Extremist Groups (India, multiple factions) – A collection of Hindu nationalist organizations advocating for a Hindu-only state and often involved in religious extremism.
• Vishwa Hindu Parishad (India) – A right-wing Hindu nationalist group known for its involvement in communal violence and promoting Hindu supremacy.
• Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (India) – A paramilitary organization promoting Hindutva ideology, influencing Indian politics through its affiliates.
• Meibuka / Japan’s Ultra-nationalists (Japan) – A nationalist movement promoting Japan’s historical military ideology and anti-immigrant sentiment.
• Lads Society (Australia) – A far-right nationalist group in Australia known for anti-immigration activism and connections to white supremacist networks.
• True Blue Crew (Australia) – An Australian nationalist group involved in street protests and opposing multicultural policies.
• Israeli Kahanist Movements (e.g., Kach, Kahane Chai) (Israel) – Jewish extremist organizations advocating for the expulsion of Arabs from Israel and supporting violent actions.
• Zaitokukai (Japan) – A Japanese far-right ultranationalist group that opposes immigration, particularly targeting ethnic Koreans in Japan.
• United Patriots Front (Australia) – A nationalist movement focused on anti-Islam and anti-immigration policies, often associated with far-right activism.
• Australian Nationalist Movement (Australia) – A far-right nationalist organization advocating for white supremacy and anti-immigration policies in Australia.

The Financial Backers of Extremism

The financial underpinnings of extremist organizations are complex and multifaceted, involving a range of actors from state sponsors to private individuals and entities. These financiers often operate through clandestine networks, utilizing various methods to channel funds that support extremist activities.

State-Sponsored Financing

Several nations have been implicated in providing financial support to extremist groups, either directly or through affiliated organizations:

• Qatar: Accusations have been leveled against Qatar for its alleged support of terrorist organizations. Evidence suggests that Qatari entities have funnelled resources to groups such as the Al-Nusra Front, the Al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria.
• Russia: Russian authorities have accused certain charities, including the Al-Haramain Foundation, of financing militant activities in regions like Chechnya and Dagestan. These organizations have been alleged to support the training and operations of extremist factions.

Private Financiers and Networks

Beyond state actors, private individuals and networks play a significant role in funding extremist activities:

• Nazem Ahmad: A diamond smuggler and art collector, Ahmad was charged with evading terrorism-related sanctions. He conducted millions of dollars’ worth of transactions in violation of the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations, allegedly financing groups like Hezbollah.
• Soliman Biheiri: An Egyptian national, Biheiri established Bait ul-Mal Incorporated (BMI) in the United States, which purportedly provided financial services to wealthy Muslims. Investigations revealed that BMI’s investor list included individuals and entities linked to designated terrorist organizations, facilitating financial support for extremist activities.
• Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks – These billionaire preachers have funded Christian nationalist organizations in the U.S., pushing for governance rooted in their conservative religious views.
• Andrew Conru – A tech entrepreneur who secretly funded the Human Diversity Foundation, an organization promoting discredited race science and eugenics.
• Richard and Elizabeth Uihlein – Major donors backing efforts to contest U.S. election outcomes, contributing to networks that challenge democratic processes.

Exploitation of Charitable Organizations

Extremist financiers often exploit charitable organizations to mask their activities:

• Al-Haramain Foundation: While presenting itself as a charitable entity, this foundation has been implicated in funding terrorist activities across various regions, including East Africa and Indonesia. Investigations revealed that funds were diverted to support operations of groups like Al-Qaeda and Jemaah Islamiyah.
• Aid Organization of the Ulema (formerly Al Rashid Trust): Based in Pakistan, this organization ostensibly engaged in charitable work but has been linked to providing financial and logistical support to militant groups, including Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Despite sanctions, it continued operations under different names, highlighting the challenges in curbing such financing channels.

Religious Leaders and Sect Influences

• Opus Dei – A powerful Catholic organization with a significant influence in Washington, D.C., seeking to integrate conservative Catholic ideology into American politics. Vice-president J.D. Vance underwent conversion to Catholicism through interactions with Opus Dei-affiliated clergy and influencers.
• Ziklag – A secretive Christian dominionist group of wealthy elites aiming to influence government and education based on their religious beliefs.
• Eric Metaxas – A prominent Christian right figure who has used historical narratives to align liberal policies with Nazism, urging political activism among Christians.

Emerging Financial Technologies

The advent of cryptocurrencies has introduced new avenues for extremist financing:

• Cryptocurrency Utilization: The anonymity and decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies make them attractive for illicit activities. Extremist groups have increasingly solicited donations in digital currencies to fund operations, procure equipment, and support members. The lack of stringent regulatory oversight in some jurisdictions facilitates this trend, raising concerns among counter-terrorism experts.

Terrorist Organizations and Private Military Companies Behind Extremist Organizations

The landscape of extremist organizations is complex, encompassing both ideologically driven terrorist groups and private military companies (PMCs) that operate in conflict zones. Understanding the distinctions and connections between these entities is crucial for comprehending the global security environment.

Terrorist Organizations

Terrorist organizations are typically non-state actors that employ violence to achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives. They often target civilians and seek to instill fear to advance their agendas. Various governments and international bodies maintain lists of designated terrorist organizations to coordinate counterterrorism efforts.

For instance, the U.S. Department of State designates Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) under Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. This designation imposes legal consequences, including sanctions and criminal penalties for support. The list includes groups such as al-Qaeda, ISIS, and Hezbollah.

Similarly, the Australian government maintains a list of proscribed terrorist organizations under its Criminal Code Act 1995. This list features entities like Boko Haram, Hamas, and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK).

Private Military Companies (PMCs)

PMCs are private business entities that provide military and security services, including armed guarding, training of local forces, and logistical support. Unlike terrorist organizations, PMCs are legally registered companies that operate under the laws of the countries in which they are based or deployed. However, their involvement in conflict zones has raised ethical and legal questions, particularly regarding accountability and the use of force.

Notable PMCs include:

• Erinys: A British firm known for securing oil assets in the Middle East and Africa. Erinys was contracted to protect key oil pipelines in Iraq and maintains a presence in the Democratic Republic of Congo to safeguard mining operations.
• Aegis Defence Services: Also based in the UK, Aegis provides security and risk management services worldwide, including in conflict zones.
• Academi: Formerly known as Blackwater, this U.S.-based company offers security services and has been involved in various operations in the Middle East.

Convergence and Distinctions

While both terrorist organizations and PMCs operate in conflict areas, their motivations and legal standings differ significantly. Terrorist groups pursue ideological goals through unlawful violence, whereas PMCs are profit-driven entities offering services that are, in many jurisdictions, legal. However, the line can blur, especially when PMCs operate with minimal oversight, leading to potential human rights violations and challenges in accountability.

Understanding the roles and regulations of these entities is essential for policymakers and international bodies aiming to address security concerns and enforce international law effectively.

Beware the Global NAZI Network!

The idea that Nazi ideology ended with World War II is a dangerous misconception. Instead, it has continued in various forms, hidden in nationalist movements, far-right extremism, and secret financial operations. The connection between nationalist groups, financial backers, and geopolitical players reveals a complex and intentional effort to reshape the world order in favor of authoritarianism.

By recognizing these networks and their financial backers, global institutions must take decisive action to counteract extremist funding, expose manipulative geopolitical strategies, and dismantle the silent resurgence of Nazi ideologies in modern politics.

At Thinquer, we remain committed to exposing these networks and shedding light on their far-reaching influence. Stay informed, engage in discussions, and check back daily for ongoing investigations. Together, we can fight against extremism and defend global democracy.

Please do not join any of these organizations!
Engaging with them is both unethical and illegal, as they train and promote dangerous radical extremists.